At 10:31 +0700 2/17/98, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote:
[...]
>
>I understand this. And this is how it works currently:
>
>select * from tab where (A,B) >= ANY (select X, Y from tab2);
>
>means: select tuples where A >= X _and_ B >= Y for some tuple from tab2.
> ^^^^^
> 'AND' is used for all Op-s except for '<>' when 'OR' is used.
>
>Question is "should we drop this feature (?) or leave it as is ?"
>
>Comments ?
>
>Vadim
I recommend dropping this feature and only supporing =ANY and <>ANY.
Supporing the relational operators cannot be optimized in the general case.
If I needed to perform the <=ANY query efficiently, I might use a
functional index on 'A' and 'B' using an R-tree method.
Regards,
--
Michael Hirohama <kamesan@ricochet.net>
